Review of Star Trek Into Darkness:
We went to the
German pre-premiere on May 8th, 2013. I know it's been a very long time
that I have posted anything on my blog, but here I go now...
Spoken
from my movie companion's point of view... it was a 'thin' story. There
wasn't nearly enough 3D visual effects, only at the beginning and at
the end. And he said the Enterprise was too modern. Other than that he
liked the movie.
Me,
as a sworn in Trekkie for decades, I have another point of view. For
the younger generation this has to be a movie magnet, a blockbuster. I
gotta agree that it's a fine science fiction piece of art by J.J.
Abrams, but... it simply isn't a Gene Roddenberry Star Trek movie.
Period.
I
liked all the action, all the visual effects, and especially all the
dialogues. It contains a lot of verbal slapstick. For the young ones it
must be a 5 star movie. For action and sci fi lovers it's a 4 star movie. For a Trekkie it only reaches 3, maybe 3.5 stars.
Here's why...
Mainly,
it just can't be romance. And most definitely no kissing or love affair
between Spock and anybody, except maybe another Vulcan during Pon Farr.
It's nice to look at, but ya know?
Secondly, the German voice of Chekov uses a terrible accent, it's too fake, I just pray the original voice is better.
Thirdly,
there wasn't nearly enough tech talk. And the technology used just
isn't right. They use something way past Voyager, but it plays during
the times of the very first Enterprise ship! There is no such thing as a
communicator that can receive texts. No tablet screen in the air can be
used to show sketches of the torpedos.
And one last thing... there was way too much crying in this movie. Action isn't tears. Science Fiction isn't tears. And for sure Star Trek isn't tears. That easy it is.
One
simply can tell that it's supposed to become a blockbuster for the
young generation, much more than the twelth movie of the Star Trek
universe.
Khan (Cumberbatch),
I like way better than Q. But somehow the imagination of an Iron
Man/Spiderman/Superman blend, who is invulnerable... is very much
action/sci fi, and so poorly treklike.
I'm
happy it is a pulsating piece of movie, which makes my action/sci fi
heart beat faster, but as a Trekkie, I'm a tad bit disappointed. I hope
they'll come up with something new now, maybe with another producer, and
no other sequel of these two.
If
you ask me, I'll tell you that it was a 'good' movie, which makes you
think of two thumbs up, but I stick to my 3.5 stars, one thumb up
theory. Better than no Star Trek movie at all...
It is worth going to the movies, great entertainment, no waste of money, so go ahead, watch it.
Another
disappointing fact was the various commercials for alcohol in advance,
the handed out alcohol freebies at the entrance, and that they put in a
wrong roll of film, which forced us to wait 45 minutes on the movie. We
weren't home before midnight. AND the theater wasn't nearly full, which
was odd for a pre-premiere with a holiday the very next day!
My report for you. Like it or not, it's my opinion.
LLAP
\\V/
